On Sunday 21 February 2016 05:51 AM, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:08:55 +0530
> Hatim Kanchwala <ha...@hatimak.me> wrote:
> 
>> Here's the updated patch which incorporates Urja's suggestion. I have also 
>> fixed the (nasty :p) typo I made earlier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hatim Kanchwala <ha...@hatimak.me>
>> ---
>>  flashchips.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  flashchips.h |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c
>> index c60514b..99b79db 100644
>> --- a/flashchips.c
>> +++ b/flashchips.c
>> @@ -6243,26 +6243,66 @@ const struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
>>                      }, {
>>                              .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} },
>>                              .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7,
>>                      }
>>              },
>>              .printlock      = spi_prettyprint_status_register_plain, /* 
>> TODO: improve */
>>              .unlock         = spi_disable_blockprotect,
>>              .write          = spi_chip_write_256,
>>              .read           = spi_chip_read,
>>              .voltage        = {2700, 3600},
>>      },
>>  
>>      {
>> +            .vendor         = "GigaDevice",
>> +            .name           = "GD25VQ41B",
>> +            .bustype        = BUS_SPI,
>> +            .manufacture_id = GIGADEVICE_ID,
>> +            .model_id       = GIGADEVICE_GD25VQ41B,
>> +            .total_size     = 512,
>> +            .page_size      = 256,
>> +            /* Lockable Security Registers: 3 * 512B total; read 0x48, 
>> write 0x42, erase 0x44 */
> 
> I have reversed that change and used 1536B for consistency here as well.
> 
>> +            .feature_bits   = FEATURE_WRSR_WREN | FEATURE_OTP | FEATURE_QPI,
>> +            .tested         = TEST_UNTESTED,
>> +            .probe          = probe_spi_rdid,
>> +            .probe_timing   = TIMING_ZERO,
>> +                .block_erasers  =
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ spaces not tabs
>> +            {
>> +              {
>> +                    .eraseblocks = { { 4 * 1024, 128} },
>> +                    .block_erase = spi_block_erase_20,
>> +              }, {
>> +                    .eraseblocks = { { 32 * 1024, 16} },
>> +                    .block_erase = spi_block_erase_52,
>> +              }, {
>> +                    .eraseblocks = { { 64 * 1024, 8} },
>> +                    .block_erase = spi_block_erase_d8,
>> +              }, {
>> +                    .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} },
>> +                    .block_erase = spi_block_erase_60,
>> +              }, {
>> +                    .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} },
>> +                    .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7,
>> +              }
>> +            },
>> +            /* TODO: 2nd Status Register; read 0x35 */
>> +            .printlock      = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp4_srwd,
>> +            .unlock         = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp4_srwd,
>> +            .write          = spi_chip_write_256,
>> +            .read           = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi 
>> I/O supported */
>> +            .voltage        = {2300, 3600},
> 
> Good catch! That is exactly the feature of the VQ ("2.5V) family. There
> is a bunch of other chips in that family in case you are not bored
> already by this ;)
> http://www.gigadevice.com/product-series/12.html
> 

Thanks! :) No, I am not bored by this. :P I'll look into them. And when I am 
done I'll send them in one comfortable patch. ;)

>> +    },
>> +
>> +    {
>>              .vendor         = "Hyundai",
>>              .name           = "HY29F002T",
>>              .bustype        = BUS_PARALLEL,
>>              .manufacture_id = HYUNDAI_ID,
>>              .model_id       = HYUNDAI_HY29F002T,
>>              .total_size     = 256,
>>              .page_size      = 256 * 1024,
>>              .feature_bits   = FEATURE_EITHER_RESET, /* Some revisions may 
>> need FEATURE_ADDR_2AA */
>>              .tested         = TEST_OK_PRE,
>>              .probe          = probe_jedec,
>>              .probe_timing   = TIMING_ZERO, /* Datasheet has no timing info 
>> specified */
>>              .block_erasers  =
>>              {
>> diff --git a/flashchips.h b/flashchips.h
>> index 74c44a0..e469363 100644
>> --- a/flashchips.h
>> +++ b/flashchips.h
>> @@ -368,26 +368,27 @@
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q20  0x4012  /* Same as GD25QB */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q40  0x4013  /* Same as GD25QB */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q80  0x4014  /* Same as GD25Q80B (which has OTP) */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q16  0x4015  /* Same as GD25Q16B (which has OTP) */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q32  0x4016  /* Same as GD25Q32B */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q64  0x4017  /* Same as GD25Q64B */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25Q128 0x4018  /* GD25Q128B only? */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25LQ40 0x6013
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25LQ80 0x6014
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25LQ16 0x6015
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25LQ32 0x6016
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25LQ64 0x6017  /* Same as GD25LQ64B (which is faster) 
>> */
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD25LQ128        0x6018
>> +#define GIGADEVICE_GD25VQ41B        0x4213
>>  #define GIGADEVICE_GD29GL064CAB     0x7E0601
>>  
>>  #define HYUNDAI_ID          0xAD    /* Hyundai */
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F400T   0x23    /* Same as HY29F400AT */
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F800B   0x58    /* Same as HY29F800AB */
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29LV800B  0x5B
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F040A   0xA4
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F400B   0xAB    /* Same as HY29F400AB */
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F002B   0x34
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F002T   0xB0
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29LV400T  0xB9
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29LV400B  0xBA
>>  #define HYUNDAI_HY29F080    0xD5
> 
> I have fixed the few issues myself, acked the patch and committed it in
> r1937. Thanks!
> 

-- 
Kind Regards,
Hatim Kanchwala
http://hatimak.me
B. Tech. Electrical Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Patna

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
flashrom@flashrom.org
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to