Hello, Stefan! Actually, I doesn't real Linux C programmer - I just passed by. :) So, I just tried to get into this area, but get very distracted by wretchedness and inconvenience of Linux development tools. I don't think there's will be next time. :) I just "threw patch away", hoping that this programmer widely enough available and somebody, having proper skills, finishes it. Seems to be, my thoughts was wrong, but till now I don't be sad. Now I surprised! Thank you for your precious time to finish this patch, Stefan!
I marked them as untested because I think that my one working quick dirty patch is not an reliable proof of testing. It doesn't need any enable routine - it has no logic, no triggers/relay - just resistors and buffer. Best regards, Max Arephin. 2016-02-21 20:45 GMT+03:00 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tau...@alumni.tuwien.ac.at> : > On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:12:08 +0300 > Max <flamma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, everybody, involved into flashrom! > > > > I'd implemented support for well known in Russia SPI_TT LPT programmer. > > Basically, it's only Byteblaster clone with changed pinout. So, > > modifications was pretty straIghtforward. > > > > In attach - modified "rayer_spi.c" from trunk branch. > > Hope, it will be useful for someone. > > Hi Max, > > thanks for your contribution! Please post a proper patch according to > our development guidelines next time: > https://www.flashrom.org/Development_Guidelines > > I have prepared a patch as you suggested and even included an entry to > the manpage. However, I wonder if you have tested your file > successfully because the tested field was set to NT instead of OK. > Also, doesn't it need any enable routine like the byteblaster? > -- > Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner >
_______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
