On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:54:50 -0700 David Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:16:18 -0700 > > David Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > > I'd love to hear some arguments about your preferences. > > > I'd be fine with libflashrom_. Since it seems there is no definitive > favorite short prefix I think we should just forget about those and use a > longer one. And in the grand scheme of things neither libflashrom_ nor > flashrom_ are very long. > After hearing the arguments on the list I too formed an opinion about the matter, my preference list is: - flashrom_ (the lib prefix is redundant IMHO, lot of libraries omit it in the API, e.g.: libglib, libgtk); - libflashrom_ (I would tolerate it, it's still better than cryptic prefixes); and maybe one I didn't see: - libfr_ (flash-rom is two words, so "fr" as abbreviation makes sense, but there's really no need to be so concise). Ciao ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
