> As the old saying goes: When in FlashRome, do as the FlashRomans do. well... this is seriously cool ! :D
On Sat, Jul 4, 2026 at 11:23 PM Abdelkader Boudih <[email protected]> wrote: > > (Dammit was later, and also there was more than one… So user-land > flash burner it is ;) ). > > > 'Later' by a whole 4 minutes and 20 seconds. 😄 Then two more 'Dammit' commits > landed just 25 seconds apart. The 'Dammit' camp clearly wins by majority vote. > > What matters most, though, is the date. > > About versioning. I would follow the usual process and not skip a version. > > No objection. As the old saying goes: When in FlashRome, do as the > FlashRomans do. - Saint ARMBrose. - > > No version skipping. > > That would be great indeed. > Do you use libflashrom in your project(s) already, or planning for future? > > > Not yet, but that is the plan. > > Right now, every tested chip ends up in: > https://github.com/seuros/flashcat/blob/master/db/spi_nor.ron > > rflasher has its own ported database: > https://github.com/ArthurHeymans/rflasher/tree/master/chips/vendors > > flashprog and several other projects maintain similar information > independently. > > This could be another RFC in the future. I would like to see a single source > of truth for chip definitions that other projects can consume. -- Anastasia. _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
