David Kleber wrote: > On our wpaNBEMS nets, we use the non-compressed version of wrap because > we're transmitting to many stations at once. Not all the stations > always get or need perfect copy, but have the benefit of getting the > gist of the message even if they loose a character here or there. > > Here's a bulletin we sent this morning. You can see it's not loaded > with critical data but we like to know if everyone got 100%. I hate the > idea of someone missing a few characters and winding up with nothing > readable, as would be the case with the compressed version. On the > other hand, with the standard wrap, if someone saw the subject matter > but got failure, they could just ask for a resend. > Thanks Dave. It sounds like your requirements are not far removed from Don's.
I will be changing flwrap to wrap ASCII text uncompressed. Binary data (images, Word documents etc) will still require compression and base64 encoding. I've already made the changes for the next posting of fldigi to suppress the leading garbage characters in an auto extracted wrap file. Dave _______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
