* On 2010 30 Dec 11:26 -0600, w1hkj wrote: > Zib, KU1T suggests: > > How about use only one place for settings, in Waterfall - and make > UI/browser to take it from there. > > Less chances for confusion (yep, dependency or difference was not > clear to me..) > > Comments?
More background information is needed, or a thread reference to understand what is being asked or suggested. Personally, I see the waterfall controls as being immediate adjustments while configuration items in the menus are generally not critical during a QSO. Perhaps the only addition I could see would be a mode change widget in the waterfall area, but nothing more. 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html _______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
