Keeping the version number the same i.e Apache Flex 4.6 could prove confusing. Resetting the version number i.e Apache Flex 1.0, would break continuity with the prev SDK versions, and add to confusion Personally Flash Builder version number and Flex SDK version number was never a source of conflict for me, meaning I always treated them seperately.
An incremental version number update seems to make sense to me i.e Apache Flex 4.6.1. On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Randy Troppmann <randy.troppm...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM, f...@rduartes.net <f...@rduartes.net> > wrote: > > > I would go as far as to suggest that the first Apache Flex release should > > equivalent in code to the current Adobe Flex 4.6 release. This would > > guarantee that there is no gap in terms of code between the Adobe era and > > the Apache era. > > > > Rui > > > > -1 > > I think releasing an identical version with the same version number > will cause confusion. Especially since the signed RSL issue has yet to > be sorted out. Let version 4.6 belong to Adobe. I would go so far as > to say to consider resetting the version number because it currently > seems tied into Flash Builder version which will also cause confusion > moving forward. >
