On 6 Jan 2012, at 22:22, Greg Reddin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com
> wrote:
I've got a question with the white board, when developing should we
use our
own domains during experimentation so there is no conflict with
anything
called spark?
Nah, I'd just use org.apache... or whatever. Since it's in the
whiteboard there's no problems with name collisions for the most part.
If I want to add say a TabNavigator to tink, should I put it in his
"navigators" trunk or create my own trunk like mschmalle/navigators
and then
use my domain name for package name for now?.
I don't know if there's a protocol for things like "personal
sandboxes". Technically it's ok to just start hacking there. Even
though it has his name on it the whole purpose of doing it there is so
others can contribute. OTOH, it does have his name on it so he might
appreciate it if you ask first. Tink, do you mind if folks contribute
to the code you posted or would you prefer they wait until you have it
more "ready"?
Greg
Yeah I just didn't take the time out to edit the package names, so
feel free to hack away in there.
If you were looking to add a TabNavigator you could create a
TabNavigatorSkin for use with a Navigator. Put a TabBar in it and bind
the dataProvider of the TabBar to the NavigatorGroup also in the skin.
Assign that skin to a Navigator and your should be up and running.
You could go one further and create a TabNavigator class that extends
Navigator and give it your new skin as a default. I'v always wondered
whether having these empty classes just so I can define a default skin
to it and give it a new name made any sense, although I did do it for
the 2 Accordions as the layout for those is a little tricker to set up.
Tink
