Ok thx ... was just a try. But least you've got my message clear :)
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:07 AM, Stephane Beladaci wrote: > +1 for a clean cut distinctive definition of what Flex is, namely an > Apache project free of Adobe and open to new corporate venture / > partnership / investment. I always said and still believe Flex will > need corporate backup and sponsors to succeeded and I also understand > / appreciate the idea of "free of corporate influence" that is applied > to Apache project, it is unclear to me yet how those contradictory > ideas will find a way to meet but a clear distinction / separation > from Adobe is both needed and beneficial in any case, imo > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com> > wrote: >> I think the whole idea of Apache Flex is to gain new investors as well, and >> that needs to be seen as something new, so a new logo that departs >> drastically from Adobes can only be seen as a move in the right direction in >> my opinion. >> >> Mike
