On 1/12/2012 12:09 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
Hi,
1. Is voting not limited to PPMC members?
I think Voting should only be for PPMC members. I guess I give that a -1
2. Whoever votes, votes 3 times in the process described above (order
of preference) (+3(most liked), +2, +1)
This is acceptable to me, but it seems odd Seems odd not to make our
first formal vote not a +1, 0, -1 approach.
I would vote 0 here.
I had previously suggested--and I believe Bertrand said the same
thing--that we vote on each entry with a +1, 0, or -1 and then tally
them up. That way each entry will get a score. I understand that could
be tedious for the person who has to tally all votes. [I'll take on
that responsibility if we want to do it that way]. This way something
will clearly rise to the top; and every entry gets acknowledged.
3. The votes are counted up using the group of 3s(most lovable) first,
if there is a tie, the the 2s are added up and the most 2s wins.
I'd vote 0 here too. If we decide to do it that way, it's fine.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
