I saw your post and figured you'd got my meaning. Thanks Matt
On 14 January 2012 23:01, Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com> wrote: > > BTW, > > Doug brought this up today and you might have read the post. I wrote a > thread called [LOGO INFO] replying to the group. I didn't quite address > your real issue (multiple submissions). This is possible with numbering the > same name in the title of separate threads. > > When I originally read this I thought you were speaking about the actual > variations on the design itself. > > Hope this clears up things for authors/designers that do feel they have > multiple logo designs. > > > Mike > > Quoting Matthew Poole <mattjpo...@gmail.com>: > > Cool. >> >> On 14 Jan 2012 13:08, "Michael Schmalle" <m...@teotigraphix.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> """ >>> Note: The design as accepted by popular vote will be treated as a >>> proposal >>> that can be tweaked and cemented into it's final published form. >>> """ >>> >>> Note the rules say "design" not logo. What you are worried about is not >>> an >>> issue. >>> >>> AIt has also been stated that the url that was submitted is the design >>> being voted on even if designers make newer versions, they need to update >>> the original submission url. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> Quoting Matthew Poole <mattjpo...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Incidentally, many of the logos on the submissions page have multiple >>> >>>> variations. How would the voters know the are voting for the >>>> same variation of a specific logo? >>>> >>>> Might not be important, but perhaps we should have stipulated that the >>>> entrants provide one variation only per submission, but allow multiple >>>> submissions per entrant? >>>> >>>> On 13 January 2012 20:26, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Rui Silva wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Alex, >>>>> > >>>>> >> IMHO, the PPMC is that set of managers and should make the final >>>>> > decision. >>>>> >> It sounds like we have some folks who understand branding issues >>>>> > commenting >>>>> >> on the submissions. I think that's enough information for the PPMC >>>>> to >>>>> > go >>>>> >> with. A popular vote in these circumstances is not controlled >>>>> enough. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Agree in full. Apart from the comments I have been making to some of >>>>> the >>>>> > logo submission there have been others with a good grasp of some of >>>>> the >>>>> > issues regarding branding doing the same. On the other hand I worry a >>>>> lot >>>>> > that, on an open, uncontrolled poll, popularity issues become >>>>> prevalent >>>>> and >>>>> > that's definitely not the way I'd like a logo for Flex to be chosen. >>>>> >>>>> This is why the vote needs to be on the list. All of us can see who >>>>> cast >>>>> each vote. A lot of work for the person tallying the results, but it is >>>>> completely transparent. This is particularly important for PPMC votes >>>>> which >>>>> are the ones that are "binding." >>>>> >>>>> The PPMC ought to consider what the larger community thinks. Remember >>>>> one >>>>> of the goals for graduation from the incubator is proving the >>>>> capability >>>>> of >>>>> growing and adding new committers to the project based on the merits of >>>>> their contributions to the community. The community includes more than >>>>> coding. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > Rui >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
