I suggest, keep AVM in Adobe until Apache delivery their first version, so we
can see the potential of Flex community and contributors to build ApacheFlex.So
me question is: who has the ability to enable more OS for mobile apps? Apache
or Adobe? (windows phone is grown to quickly, we need into that OS too, what
community think?)
Franklin Garzón
Regional Development Manager
MCTS - MCITP Microsoft SQLServer 2005
*Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejaría de existir*
094496862 / 593-022234585
> From: jonbcam...@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:10:31 -0600
> Subject: Re: Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:15 PM, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote:
>
> > In what way isn't what I said 100% true? Who other than Apache Flex
> > committers will get to choose what the future of the Flex language is?
> >
>
> We have control of the SDK, not the language. The language as part of the
> AVM is still controlled by Adobe. We can use the compiler to "adjust" the
> code as it's compiled to simulate the changes we may be interested in,
> however this code would be much slower than if it was running on the core
> language from the AVM. Ultimately I would recommend against people thinking
> they are going to change the Date object or the floating point value of
> Number or other deep language features.
>
> We've discussed this on forums though so I won't go into it too much more.
