On 1/18/2012 2:45 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 1/18/12 10:53 AM, "Arnoud Bos"<arn...@artim-interactive.nl> wrote:
Yeah I would go for a 4.7 initial apache flex release too.
Especially because i sense the general intension here is to release a few
compatible versions first.
It's just less confusing IMHO.
Arnoud
I just got confirmation that FlashBuilder will not be using years, so my
proposal is that Apache Flex uses years. The first release, even if it is
just approximate parity with Adobe Flex 4.6 would be called "Apache Flex
2012". Any other release cut this year would be a point release ("Apache
Flex 2012.1")
Is there any other software that uses the "year" approach. ( Aside
from Windows 2000/2003, etc..)
Sometimes version numbers communicate the breadth of the release to
customers, users, and programmers. By switching to a year model would
we lose our ability to do that?
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
