Nvm, on my request. Forgive mi ignorance :) I researched a little bit about the PPMC :) I'm new to this list, and i don't know where this thread would surface. if anyone could pass that along that'd be great :)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jeff Tapper <j...@spoon.as> wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:09 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs > > (PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread. > > Do we have general consensus on the following: > > (1) Vote is 5 points to be distributed to 1 to 5 of the logos as the voter > determines. > > (2) Vote is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are binding and tabulated > separately from the community. The PPMC is advised to reconsider if the > community's opinion differs. > > (3) If multiple vote emails are received from any individual then the last > one is counted and previous votes discarded. > > (4) There will be multiple rounds of voting. > > What criteria do we use to remove logos from next rounds? A suggestion. The > bottom half of logos are removed. If there are an odd number of logos then > the median is kept. (if 27 left then #14 is kept.) If any remaining logos > (including the median) have less than N/2 votes where N is the number of > voters then remove those too. > > (5) When do we declare a winner? A simple majority of the votes points cast. > > (6) How long is each round? A minimum of 72 hours. > > Regards, > Dave > > On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > >> Quoting Doug Arthur <dougart...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Mike started the entire voting process and has taken charge of it the >>> entire time. I will put my trust in him to initiate a voting process >>> and define the rules based on feedback received so far from everyone. >>> >>> I would at least, suggest to Mike, that he post a pre-proposal to the >>> voting process, and if no one absolutely rejects, then proceed. The >>> pre-proposal really shouldn't be a discussion, but rather a semi-vote >>> (but not really a vote) to poll if there are any critical rejections >>> whereas the majority don't agree with his direction. >>> >>> My 2 cents... >>> - Doug >>> >> >> Heh, >> >> I'm going to be honest here, this should have been concluded last week. I > tried to get a consensus just for the plain reason of order, it didn't > happen and you have this thread. >> >> I really don't think I want the target aimed at me on this. I tried my > best to keep order up to this point(website, entires managed) but I really > don't feel like making any decisions/proposals when this should have been > agreed to last week. >> >> To many cooks in the kitchen people. I have also stayed away from this > because of the polarity of PPMC votes to community votes. >> >> So now, whoever is louder take the baton and run! >> >> Mike >> >> > >
