I also only saw the ship once someone mentioned it :-). So I don't think we have to worry about that.
However I do see the F submerged in water with a sun setting behind it. It's also very pretty. I wonder what it would look like with words, rather than the F, reflecting? John 2012/1/18 Nataliya Shevchenko <s...@sei.cmu.edu> > Great logo! One needs to have quite an imagination to see a sunken ship > there (it's immediate association, in a couple of months nobody from > general public will remember the accident). > My first association was American Indian's hut/house, but mountain is good > too. And reflection works here as well - it completes the shape to a double > square. > > Very well done! > > --Natasha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Calvin Huang [mailto:leze.majes...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:43 AM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Logo] Kap IT proposal #2 > > Personally, I see more of a mountain/iceberg than a sunken ship, > especially if you remove the reflection. It's a fine looking logo > regardless. > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Martin Heidegger <m...@leichtgewicht.at > >wrote: > > > My _first_ association was a half-sunken ship when I saw the logo. And > > I thought therefore the logo was inappropriate. > > If I am alone with this first association I am fine with the logo but > > I am pretty sure I am not the only one who thinks that way. > > So: I hope it does influence the voters as I think its a valid concern. > > > > yours > > Martin > > > > > > On 18/01/2012 14:04, James Ong wrote: > > > >> It's doesn't matter what we see, I hope your message doesn't > >> influence the voters. > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Martin > >> Heidegger<m...@leichtgewicht.at> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Does no one see a half sunken ship? > >>> > >> > > >
