Multicolored +1 Blue (4th) +1 2012/2/3 João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com>
> On 3 February 2012 10:27, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: > > > Who's brilliant idea was it to divide the single colour vote across four > > viable candidates, thus ensuring the multi-coloured option easily won the > > vote? This vote couldn't have been more rigged (no doubt completely > > accidently in this case) if people had tried! > > > > How about we make the vote fair?? Either offer up four multi-coloured > > options to balance the four single-coloured ones, or change the vote to > be > > simply between a multi-coloured or single-coloured logo. > > > > David. > > > > > David we would eventually discuss that on another thread and leave this one > just for voting. I think it could be a valid point but if every time > someone comes along with a new "issue" with the current vote, it won't ever > stop. > > -- > > João Fernandes >
