+1 for Piergiorgio
:) Il giorno 07 febbraio 2012 08:54, Piergiorgio Niero < piergiorgio.ni...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > my humble opinion is: > all threads are discussion, if we're going to have many threads on a > specific topic just move those threads in another mailing list. > special things such as voting and polling people are best done with other > tools such as google forms and others. i personally found ridiculous 100+ > mail/day with "+1,+20,+N" for voting the logo. > > ciao > pigiuz > > > Il giorno 04 febbraio 2012 20:43, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> ha > scritto: > > > > > On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Greg Reddin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my mobile device. > > > > > > On Feb 4, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Doug McCune <d...@dougmccune.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Is it really necessary to subject-tag any [Discussion] thread? > > > > > > About the only time that's necessary is when you want to discuss a vote > > thread in progress. It's a good idea to fork that to a discussion thread > > and use the tag to make it clear. > > > > IMHO it is also a good idea to prepare for a [VOTE] thread by first > having > > a [DISCUSS] thread (that's the process on private when discussing > possible > > new PPMC and committers.) sometimes as this thread implies that is pretty > > obvious. > > > > In a high volume list this will call attention to an issue. Generally we > > should be striving to achieve "LAZY CONSENSUS" when doing that it should > be > > a [DISCUSS] or [PROPOSAL] thread. A [VOTE] would then be called if > > consensus is not present. > > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > > > > Greg > > > > > > > >
