Michael's generous offer sounds like a no-brainer to me. If FlexUnit merges in with Apache Flex, we have the original author on the PPMC, and it is supported in both IntelliJ and Flash Builder, I see absolutely no reason to consider supporting another unit testing framework for the Apache Flex project.
E Espen Skogen | Vice President | IB Tech Market | Investment Bank | J.P. Morgan | 125 London Wall, EC2Y 5AJ, London, United Kingdom | T: +442077420836 | espen.sko...@jpmorgan.com | jpmorgan.com -----Original Message----- From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net] Sent: 09 February 2012 19:35 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test System? Not sure how the logistics of this would work, however, if we wanted to bring FlexUnit into the fold, I would be willing to donate all of the code to Apache directly. Right now it is MIT license. -----Original Message----- From: Piotr Kawiak [mailto:piotr.kaw...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:27 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test System? What about test reports? If there are two test frameworks used then I guess one either have to somehow merge the results or live with a set of two reports? Notice: This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmission by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone and delete the original transmission. Thank you. This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
