My personal workflow wouldn't change if we had it, but I agree that it is a useful piece of FB (especially for newer devs) and if we could have it, then that would be terrific!
+1 JP On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > > I don't think any number of +1s will convince Adobe either way. > > Honestly, I personally could care less about design view. It made sense > when Adobe wanted to make Flex the "new Visual Basic" and accessible to > anyone. I'm not sure if I would put effort to try to fulfill that role, > though. > > > > On 2/22/2012 10:27 AM, Charles Monteiro wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> its essential for RAD , Design View is key to prototyping , getting things >> up and running, source view is for tweaking and polishing, both are >> essential in any modern RAD environment >> >> + 1000 really >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Iuri Pereira<iuri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Iuri >>> >>> >>> 2012/2/22 Arturo Alvarado<art...@centraldcom.com> >>> >>>>> Another +1, it's good for quick wireframes and getting started >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, Design View is very important to learn the Flex components >>>> >>>> behaviours. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> Bruce Lane >>>> >>>> +1 Also >>>> >>>> Arturo Alvarado >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > 203-379-0773 > -- > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > -- > http://www.theflexshow.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > -- > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > -- JP Bader Principal Zavteq, Inc. @lordB8r | j...@zavteq.com 608.692.2468
