On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jonathan Campos <jonbcam...@gmail.com>wrote:
> While I get the intention I think that to go down this path will cause > confusion and also reduce people's abilities to see new features and > functionality (specifically in the case of TileList, HRule/VRule, > LinkButton... well all of them). Just one more thought. My biggest issue with keeping this list and requiring a 1-1 equivalent is what happens the next time we figure out a really good way to make components? Now we have to port the entire list over whether they are needed or not just to keep "the list" going. Things like TileList I was happy to see start dying out for the more flexible List+TileLayout. I think we should continue down this path rather than keeping up with a 1-1 list. I do like the fact we are keeping a list of "missing components" for people to work on. I just feel that more discretion needs to be taken before adding items to the list wholesale. -- Jonathan Campos
