Hi, > My vote is to keep the spark ns in the 4.x branch and then have a new > namespace when we decide to create a new set of components. 100% agree with that. Again not suggestion we change existing name space just that we add one or two.
> I do agree with Daniel in that we don't use "apache" or any derivation as > we are then stuck for the next set of components. Stuck how exactly? Package names may be a bit longer but is that really an issue? > Though I may be convinced to have a namespace for experimental components. Any idea what you would name it? Thanks, Justin
