If we use this URL as the namespace
http://www.apache.org/flex
when we have a new component set, what new URL would you then use?
We should start out with this in mind, so something like
http://www.apache.org/flex/COMPONENT_SET_NAME
to enable use to add sets in the future.
As or current components will be based on the Spark architecture, I
would suggest
http://www.apache.org/flex/spark
and use "as" (Apache Spark) for the prefix.
Tink
On 16 Mar 2012, at 09:15, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
This really won't allow for multiple sets of components under Apache
moving forward.
Why do you think it won't allow for multiple sets of components?
Couldn't
we just use different namespaces and URLs for each set?
Maybe I'm not understanding something correctly.
Also, I think it'd be nice if the namespace URLs were reflective of
the
version of the components and that the URL actually pointed to the
ASDocs
for those components. Not sure if that is somehow not feasible or a
bad
idea, I think it would be useful.
--
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...@apache.org