I don't see the problem either. Tink
aYo ~ <a...@binitie.com> wrote: >I really do not see any problem here. Its flexible and that's the point. >a >On 17 Mar 2012 01:55, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If we make no changes it probably means that down the track we're likely >> to end up with this: >> >> <s:Application width="100%" >> xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; >> xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" >> xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" >> xmlns:a="http://flex.apache.org/ns"; >> xmlns:as="http://flex.apache.org/sparkns"; >> xmlns:amx="http://flex.apache.org/mxns"; >> xmlns:nc="http://flex.apache.org/ncns";> >> >> Which I'd like to avoid somehow. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> PS "nc" is new component model that someone's come up.
