Oops just realized that current package names do not contain any reference to Adobe, so I want to correct my vote: 1) +1 2) -1
Haykel On 31 March 2012 10:08, Haykel BEN JEMIA <hayke...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) +1 > 2) +1. I suggest also to add a script or ant target to port old code. > > Haykel > > > > > On 31 March 2012 06:06, Martin Heidegger <m...@leichtgewicht.at> wrote: > >> I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" package was not >> finished and there is still the ISSUE Flex-7[1] open. >> >> So I suggest that we start voting on that, please vote on following >> points: >> >> 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 >> 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 >> >> Anything beyond that is too far in the future to discuss that now imho. >> >> yours >> Martin >> >> PS.: Please read about the apache voting process [2] if you are not sure >> what the options are. >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-7<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-7> >> [2] >> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/voting.html<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >> > >
