On 4/12/12 3:46 PM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >> It would obviously be better to have unit tests, but if the compiler can >> compile the framework and pass the framework tests, it can't be too broken. > > I am working on building a set of basic tests using the tamarin acceptance > tests. Hopeful to have something soon. Tamarin is MPL isn't it? If so be careful about how you depend on it. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- MXMLC now in trunk Alex Harui
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Omar Gonzalez
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Joan Llenas Masó
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Martin Heidegger
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Justin Mclean
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Martin Heidegger
- RE: MXMLC now in trunk Gordon Smith
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Omar Gonzalez
- RE: MXMLC now in trunk Michael A. Labriola
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Alex Harui
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Bertrand Delacretaz
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Alex Harui
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Pepe
- RE: MXMLC now in trunk David Coleman
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Alex Harui
- RE: MXMLC now in trunk David Coleman
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Alex Harui
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Justin Mclean
- Re: MXMLC now in trunk Alex Harui
- [RT] MXMLC tests & future was: MXMLC now in t... Martin Heidegger