> > I think the tool refactors implied in tools like Fb or Intellij will be of > low impact and should not be a problem to stop evolution, since is > re-structure of the sdk to be a more standard piece of software... maybe > I'm talking from a feeling that this not should be a huge showstopper. >
What about existing Flash Builder or IntelliJ installations, i.e. users who are using these IDEs and are awaiting new Flex SDK releases? On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Carlos Rovira < carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > First, I'm not saying we must change structure to make Flex SDK > only-maven-compliant. I'm saying that we need some refactoring to be > compliant with all BMS (not only maven). Think in some java project that > could be build using ANT, Maven, Gradle and so on... ¿ok? > > Second, we are dragging lots of problems cause no changes were made before. > We are here to evolve the SDK to be better and that requires changes that > make more powerful the SDK (in this case to buy build more easily and by > more build systems). > > I think the tool refactors implied in tools like Fb or Intellij will be of > low impact and should not be a problem to stop evolution, since is > re-structure of the sdk to be a more standard piece of software... maybe > I'm talking from a feeling that this not should be a huge showstopper. > > I think this will be lots more benefitial than the possible derivated > problems that could generate. > > > 2012/5/24 Jonathan Campos <jonbcam...@gmail.com> > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Breaking existing tools like Flash Builder, IntelliJ just to make Maven > > > work is not the best idea. We are at a very delicate point in terms of > > end > > > users' confidence and trust. Lets not break the camel's back. > > > > > > > I 100% agree with Om. We don't want to get into the (very) bad habit of > > "we're going to make a change and you need to move with us". Tool > > developers don't like that very much. I think the fewer waves we make to > > the ecosystem during the 4.x branch the better. > > > > -- > > Jonathan Campos > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > Avd. del General Perón, 32 > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q > 28020 Madrid >
