On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Carol Frampton <[email protected]> wrote: > Does this mean that we can include the apache jars that we use in our source > package? How about in our binary package?
My preference would be that these files are downloaded as part of the build process. Looking at the list, I'm not sure if they are all still available and I'm not sure they are all Apache jars. I guess these are dependencies? We'd need to treat them like any other dependency I think. > 2. We've run RAT. We currently have a few hundred files flagged as > binaries. Many of them are asset files. Is there some sort of exception > process for these? I can't really comment on this. I would assume there's a way to do this, but I don't know. > 3. If you have a .fla file which is a source file for Adobe Flash > Professional does that mean we have to require Adobe Flash Professional as a > prerequisite build tool? We have other similar situations which involve > different apps/tools to produce different assets. Is Flash Pro required to run a successful build? If so, then I guess we do need it as a requirement. If not then it's optional I guess. Sorry for my non-definitive answers. I don't really have the experience to offer definitive ones, so hopefully some others can chime in to confirm or correct. Greg
