On 6/12/12 11:47 AM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> I think this is a fantastic idea. I would love to help out. Every time I
> work with resource bundles, I keep having similar thoughts. I never took a
> chance to write it out so clearly like you have done.
>
> What I dont get is why we would need a FB/Eclipse plugin if we manage to
> make these changes to the compiler. As you example points out, a valid
> class would be created in the src path. This would take care of the
> auto-complete requirements, right? All IDEs should be able to work with
> it.
IMO, something like an "R" class should not be put into the compiler or the
IDE. The compiler should be as framework agnostic as possible. It is
probably possible to create a set of classes that do what R does.
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Dirk Eismann <bort...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm currently experimenting on how to improve resource management in
>> future Apache Flex versions.>>
>>
>> So... what do you think? I would also like to know what other people
>> have in mind concerning asset / resource bundle management, maybe we
>> can team up?
>>
How many of you use non-String resources? A String-only resource system can
be so much better optimized than what we have now. I would love to phase
out the current ResourceManager subsystem and replace it with something much
smaller and faster.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
