> > t saying it is worth it in order to protect the integrity of trunk. > > If it's possible, yes, I really do think Git would help. The reason is > that dealing with merge issues in Git are infinitely easier and, at least > 95% of the time, keeps us out of the merge-hell that I think Justin > legitimately fears. > > The one nice thing about the release and feature branches is that it > allows people to start working toward future releases and grand visions > while a current release is being stabilized. For example the code many had > in whiteboards that was destined for future releases. > > Mike > > I agree with all of this. I would be completely in favor of making Git the primary SCM for the project, it would really make a lot of these workflows easier to manage amongst so many developers. I also posted about the link Mike shared and that model has worked great for our teams.
-omar
