On 8/28/12 5 :53AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>-createImages is now the default run option? Personally I think you should not use -createImages the first time you run the tests. Use imageDiff to make sure the failures are just font differences. If they are then rerun with -createImages. If you use -createImages right away you won't find other problems because they now become the "good" images. > >EdB > > > >On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Carlos Rovira ><carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >> Hi Erik, >> >> just try the Applications folder with: >> >> ./mini_run.sh -createImages tests/Application/ >> >> [java] ===================================================== >> [java] Passes: 273 >> [java] Fails: 0 >> [java] ===================================================== >> >> I'm on Mac OSX 10.8.1, as you say there's a missing tess the 124... :? >> (maybe in Exclussion list?) >> >> Maybe Peter could know something about it. >> >> But, what is clear is that this folder seems ok... >> >> >> >> 2012/8/28 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>: >>> Carlos, >>> >>>> you should try to rerun with -createImages flag. See if that helps >>> >>> I just did: I fetched a clean working copy of the develop branch of >>> the SDK and ran "./mini_run.sh tests/Application -createImages" >>> >>> It now passes 273 tests... which is a bit more than the table on the >>> Wiki suggests there should be (124). Weird, or just a whoopsie in the >>> table? >>> >>> Should I run all test with "-createImages"? Or only the first time I >>>run a test? >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>> T. 06-51952295 >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> Director de Tecnología >> M: +34 607 22 60 05 >> F: +34 912 35 57 77 >> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. >> Avd. del General Perón, 32 >> Planta 10, Puertas P-Q >> 28020 Madrid > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
