I don't think that Adobe is backing away from donating FalconJS. But code can 
typically never be donated "as is" for various legal reasons. Even if the code 
doesn't compile or run, it still takes someone at Adobe to do prep work like 
putting in Apache copyright headers, changing the package names from ones 
involving "adobe" and "flash" (which I think trademarks of Adobe), scrubbing 
comments that aren't intended for public consumption, making the build script 
compliant with Apache's requirements, getting Adobe Legal to sign off, etc. It 
will probably end up either being me, Alex, or Carol that does this work, even 
though none of us worked on FalconJS, because the engineer who did is working 
on other stuff now.

- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Omar Gonzalez [mailto:omarg.develo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:41 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update on Falcon donation

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote:

> No, sorry. FalconJS was a separate experimental project by a separate 
> team (actually, by one person). It adds on to Falcon but isn't 
> considered part of Falcon.  It hasn't been maintained for a number of 
> months and isn't currently in shape to be donated. One of Adobe's next 
> steps after donating Falcon will be to figure out what to do about FalconJS.
>
> - Gordon


Thanks for the updates, Gordon.

I think even if the state of FalconJS has gotten out of sync with the current 
state of Falcon people will still be very interested in the approach and, I 
think, more than likely will want to at least use the code as reference for 
getting a "FalconJS" closer to production-ready. Not sure if community feedback 
will be part of the decision Adobe makes on what to do with FalconJS, but if it 
counts for anything I'm pretty sure the community will take the project in any 
state it may be in. I know I would.
:)

-omar

Reply via email to