On 11/21/12 11:59 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

> Buuuuuut ... thinking of it :-)
> 
> Mabe it would indeed be better to start with Falcon as this is definitely the
> future of Flex and Flexmojos already lets you build using MXMLC ... And I
> always wanted to start digging into it, but never actually found a usecase for
> it.
> 
> @Alex: Perhaps if Adobe were to publish the playerglobal and the airglobal
> (Don't need the runtime ... think mavenizing the Runtim is too much ... would
> simply use the runtimes from PATH).
> Without those TWO artifacts the final solution would always be half-baked (No
> matter what compiler) as no user could: "simply add the plugin and start
> coding flex" :-) 
> So what do you think? You make the one thing happen, and I'll do the second?
> ;-)
> 
I need convincing that this will work for captive runtime for mobile apps,
and not sure how you are supposed to get the other executables that help
make up the AIR package.

But if you want to try prototyping it, feel free.  I wll try to find time to
help next week, if you need help.  I want to make sure it will work before
we go ask for approvals.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to