Did you try Uglify.js? It has about the same compression results as GCC but runs a lot faster. There's also an Uglify 2.0 that's supposed to be even faster than 1.x.
-omar On Tuesday, December 4, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Hi, > > After a lot of reading, trying and testing, as well as looking at the > current code and compiler output, I think the project is best of using > the Google Closure Tools. Both for developing and deploying FlexJS > components and applications. I've implemented them into the FlexJS > workflow, and provided instructions on how install and use them: > Closure Linter, -Compiler, -Builder and finally the -Library [1]. The > end result of this toolchain will highly optimized and compressed JS, > while allowing for an intermediate step (for dev/debug) that supports > all major AS features (inheritance, interfaces, variable scope, > constants, strong typing etc.). > > Not all the pieces are in place, so a little patience, please ;-) > > Also, as I refactored the framework "a bit", the FalconJS people can > dig their teeth into a new output template/pattern (simpler than the > one currently used). > > EdB > > 1: https://developers.google.com/closure/ > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
