On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I am sorry, but it does not make sense to release something that has not > been tested. > Again I agree but we have to live with what we have. I'm sure that the the > tests we currently have do not provide 100% coverage. > > > It is an entirely different issue to not test it at all. > As I said we did exactly that with the previous release (for charts). > > Justin
The previous release was a parity release, no code changes in charts therefore tests weren't important. This time around, what Om is saying, there are changes and we have tests. It would be dumb not to use them. -omar
