I'm on Mac as well. I've read both this and Schmalle's reply and I still don't know what to do in Eclipse.
Under compiler.tests there is a unit-tests folder. Is that what you guys are clicking on to run the tests? Is there really no other way to configure the run environment than to add environment variables outside of Eclipse? On 12/7/12 3:41 PM, "Chema Balsas" <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, this took me some time to get it sorted too... > > If anyone is on MacOS, what I did is create a /etc/launchd.conf file with > these content > > setenv PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME > setenv FLEX_HOME > setenv AIR_HOME > > With that, I get the tests running in Eclipse. > > The variables set there are passed to any application launched from > Finder/Spotlight, and are loaded on startup, so after creating it, a reboot > is required. > > I don't know if something similar works for windows though. > > 2012/12/8 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > >> The copy.sdk target is still in there if you need it. >> >> But first, wow do you use the unit tests from Eclipse? I've never tried >> it, >> I always use the command line. Do you set up a run config of some sort? >> If >> you set a FLEX_HOME in the config's environment does that work? >> >> Once I understand how you use Eclipse I will try to get it to work. >> >> >> On 12/7/12 3:27 PM, "Gordon Smith" <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> After trying and failing to do any Falcon work today, I'll keep >> complaining >>> about this. The unit tests are no longer working in Eclipse. I get >>> >>> command line >>> Error: unable to open >>> >> 'D:\Apache\incubator\flex\falcon\trunk\compiler\generated\dist\sdk\frameworks>> \ >>> mxml-2009-manifest.xml'. >>> >>> command line >>> Error: unable to open >>> >> 'D:\Apache\incubator\flex\falcon\trunk\compiler\generated\dist\sdk\frameworks>> \ >>> libs\player\11.1\playerglobal.swc'. >>> >>> This is presumably because the SDK is no longer being copied into a >> place that >>> the unit tests can find them. The unit tests can't use an environment >> variable >>> to find them because it is infeasible to specify that environment every >> time >>> you want to make an Eclipse debug config for a particular unit test. >>> >>> Is there some way to make this work in Eclipse that I don't know about, >> so >>> that every JUnit test "just work" without having to customize a >> run-config or >>> debug-config for it? >>> >>> If not, I will restore some ant targets to do the SDK copying. Alex may >> not >>> want to use them, but I need to. >>> >>> - Gordon >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Gordon Smith >>> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 2:58 PM >>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing >>> >>> OK, then I'll stop complaining. >>> >>> - Gordon >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:59 PM >>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing >>> >>> The versions in compiler/commandline already looked for FLEX_HOME >> environment >>> variable. >>> >>> >>> On 12/6/12 1:56 PM, "Gordon Smith" <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I should have said Falcon's 'mxmlc' and 'compc' shell scripts. >>>> >>>> - Gordon >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Gordon Smith >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:55 PM >>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing >>>> >>>> So, how does Falcon's 'asc' shell script do its job? Did you make it >>>> use an environment variable to find an SDK? >>>> >>>> - Gordon >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:40 PM >>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/6/12 12:57 PM, "Gordon Smith" <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> But doesn't it make it impossible to use Falcon's shell scripts, >>>>> which expect to find other things in the SDK using relative paths >>>>> from those shell scripts??? >>>> You mean like the mxmlc and compc scripts? They take a FLEX_HOME >>>> environment variable and seem to be working. >>>>> >>>>> Falcon isn't going to be independent of the SDK in the sense of being >>>>> external to it. The goal is for it to replace the old compiler *in* >>>>> the SDK. I don't want to be polluting an SDK with Falcon until it is >>>>> ready, but it made sense to me to copy whatever SDK you want test >>>>> Falcon with into Falcon's directory, so that everything is relative >>>>> to each other as it will eventually be. >>>>> >>>> I guess I haven't given up on the vision of Falcon being so >>>> independent that it doesn't have to be in every SDK release. For >>>> sure, I am currently working on a "new SDK" and I want Falcon and >>>> FalconJS to work with it. I want to finish the vision of not having to >>>> change Falcon for every version of the SDK. >>>> That would eventually allow the SDK folder to not contain any java >>>> code, and changing SDK versions becomes a matter of changing SWCs and >> not >>>> JARs. >>>> >>>> And I don't want to eliminate the possibility that someone will take >>>> on the effort to integrate Falcon into an IDE. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex Harui >>>> Flex SDK Team >>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alex Harui >>> Flex SDK Team >>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>> >> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >> -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
