We've been putting them in SVN because we did so at Adobe. I know folks don't like it, but when the project setup isn't trivial (you need dependent projects) I think it is helpful. The pain point is you have to hand edit the file before submitting to make sure it doesn't have absolute paths in it.
On 12/12/12 4:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thank's Nick > > - Fred > > -----Message d'origine----- > From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:51 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: New Spark components > > I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible... > > -Nick > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS > <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools >> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and >> there >> are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still >> include >> them or not, what the policy ? >> >> - Fred >> >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS >> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM >> >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: New Spark components >> >> Oups, I missed this message. >> >> Yes, sure, I do that. >> >> - Fred >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui >> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: New Spark components >> >> Frédéric, >> >> Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution? >> >> -Alex >> >> >> On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <flex.programm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >>> >>> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of >>> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation >>> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the >>> project >>> PMC that your ICLA has been filed." >>> >>> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :) >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Bogdan DINU >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bogdan, >>>> >>>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take >>>> further >>>> action on this side. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <flex.programm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue >>>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284< >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.or >>>> g/jira/browse/FLEX-33284> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Bogdan >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS >>>>> <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>**wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bogdan, >>>>>> >>>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away >>>>>> >>>>> for >>>> >>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your contribution. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Fred. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM >>>>>> >>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial >>>>>> project, >>>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a >>>>>> Robotlegs >>>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened). >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm >>>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've >>>>>> brought >>>>>> them to the community attention in the first place. >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Bogdan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < >>>>>> >>>>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>>> >>>>> **wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for >>>>>> its >>>>>> >>>>>>> feedback. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank's guys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How does it happen ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> submitter >>>> >>>>> had >>>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went >>>>>>> >>>>>> away, >>>> >>>>> so >>>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of >>>>>>> >>>>>> course, >>>> >>>>> in >>>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop >>>>>>> >>>>>> and >>>> >>>>> address it before committing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Fred. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>> From: Alex Harui >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM >>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but >>>> >>>>> at >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so >>>>>>>>>> noticed, >>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> what¹s >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or >>>>>>>>> was it >>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the >>>>>>>> ownership >>>>>>>> of all of this work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> been >>>> >>>>> added >>>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other >>>>>>>>> namespaces >>>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Justin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/** >>>>>>>>> **licenses/icla.txt> >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licens >>>> >>>>> es/icla.txt> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/license >>>>>>>>> s/icla.txt> >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/ <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> >>>> >>>>> icla.txt> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex Harui >>>>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://www.badu.ro >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex Harui >>>> Flex SDK Team >>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >> > -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
