Fred, I tried to run mustella and got an error about a missing class ErrorArray. Did you check it in?
On 12/12/12 12:51 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Well, I guess I mixed the 2 threads, the one about the rc and the one about > the checkin-test, my bad but thank's because you answered my question > anyway. > > - Fred. > > -----Message d'origine----- > From: Alex Harui > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:44 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9 > > > > > On 12/12/12 12:30 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> Then will run mustella on it. Has anyone done a full mustella run on the >>> rc >> >> I didn't do it on the rc but the develop branch today and was wondering if >> the last fixes could be integrated in the rc. > I'm not sure what you mean by "last fixes". I forgot to start a mustella > run on the changes I have pending last night. I have moved the changes over > to my Windows computer and am setting up to run mustella against RC2 (now > that I've fixed the build script). If that passes then I will check those > changes into RC2. I can't imagine mustella would pass against RC2 for > anybody until I get my changes verified and checked in. > > Any changes you've made in the develop branch that are needed to get > mustella to pass should get integrated over to release4.9 branch (although, > in theory, better to apply the changes into the release4.9 branch and bring > them back to develop branch). However, my current workflow is to run the > develop branch's mustella against the RC itself, so I don't have to > integrate develop branch mustella changes into release4.9. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
