I have checked in everything to the release4.9 branch that I think we need to get mustella to pass. I will do another run tonight, which I expect to go well.
I'm actually running the mustella tests in the develop branch against a modified RC. To do so, set sdk.dir in the mustella/local.properties and FLEX_HOME environment variables to the rc, then run mini_run from the develop branch's mustella folder. If we can get a new RC that includes my last changes (rev 1422140) I will do the run against that instead. On 12/14/12 1:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> 1. The build number was not set in RC2 when you build it. > Thanks I'll check that out. > >> 2. apache.swc and experimental.swc were missing from the binary kit so I >> added them. > I'll also check if we missing any of the new locales. > >> 3. I add a java source and target of 1.6 to the compile target in the >> batik build file so if you build the compiler with Java 1.7, FlashBuilder >> 4.7 seems happy. > Wonderful, I wasn't optimistic there was good solution to that. Why FB 4.7 > wont let you compile for Java 1.7, especially when 1.6 it's being EOLed in > February is beyond me. > >> 5. We did not make a decision on what version of AIR to recommend/run >> mustella with. > I'll see if I can package it up with AIR 3.4. > > We've also not decided on what version of flash player to go with, as we're > not using any of the new features in 11.2-11.5 I'll just stick with 11.1 as > the default for now. > > Thanks, > Justin -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
