Super-poms are under a different licensing, MIT: http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/trunk/rvin-mojo/super-poms/licenses.txt
I add a comment on all super-poms: http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/trunk/rvin-mojo/super-poms/src/main/resources/air.pom http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/trunk/rvin-mojo/super-poms/src/main/resources/common.pom http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/trunk/rvin-mojo/super-poms/src/main/resources/flex.pom That is valid to old versions super-poms and to super-poms only. Do you think this license should be declared anywhere else or Is that enough? VELO On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jaza <[email protected]> wrote: > > The project page says Flex Mojos is gpl, but none of the poms I looked > mentioned a license. > > If it isn't gpl then I would like things changed to reflect that so I > can use them. > > Since flex mojos are gpl, and I need t use one of its super poms as a > parent to my own or put code from it in my pom, I would have to gpl my > pom & that is unacceptable. This makes Flex Mojos absolutely useless > to me, and severely limits the number of projects that can use this to > mostly gpl projects. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
