Thanks for the full and detailed answer. And why you yet did not realise it? You do not have time or it simply is not necessary — there is other more correct solution?
On Jan 18, 5:45 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, yes.... and no =P > > You can use incremental compilation with VirtualLocalFile objects. This > > > makes compilation more efficient because > > the compiler only recompiles the virtual file that was changed and not all > > files that are in the application. You > > typically use incremental compilation in a Java application that builds a > > Flex application more than once. The first > > time the Flex application is built, the compiler compiles all parts of the > > application. On subsequent compilations, if > > you use incremental compilation, the compiler only compiles the parts of > > the application that changed. > > http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/compilerAPI_flex3.pdf > > In fact, incremental compilation is only useful on persistent application. > But that is not the case here =( > > And I don't use VirtualLocalFile, and I think make no difference, since JVM > is closed every time. > > May be doing something like serialize VirtualLocalFiles to disk and reload > it. > > VELO > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:34 PM, develar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I always get error: Failed to match the compile target with /private/ > > tmp/Flex2_14841. The cache file will not be reused. > > > flex-mojos support incremental compilation or not? Mac OS X 10.5.6, > > Windows XP SP3, Ubuntu 8.10, java 1.6. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
