So is this no longer the correct repository URL?
<repository>
<id>flex-mojos-repository</id>
<url>http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/repository/
</url>
<releases><enabled>true</enabled></releases>
<snapshots><enabled>false</enabled></snapshots>
</repository>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2.0 and 2.0.1 are final releases.
>
> Someone found a bug on 2.0, so I release 2.0.1
>
> So the lastest stable is 2.0.1
>
>
> VELO
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> OK, I'm doing flex-mojos for real this time. Assuming all goes well...
>>
>> Took my simplest working POM, changed 2.0M10 to 2.0.1 - can't find
>> super-pom.
>>
>> <parent>
>> <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId>
>> <artifactId>flex-super-pom</artifactId>
>> <version>2.0.1</version>
>> </parent>
>>
>> <repository>
>> <id>flex-mojos-repository</id>
>> <url>
>> http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/repository/</url>
>> <releases><enabled>true</enabled></releases>
>> <snapshots><enabled>false</enabled></snapshots>
>> </repository>
>>
>> It's really hard to know at any given point, what the best practices are.
>> Reading this mailing list, I glean that 2.0.1 is not final. So I try
>> <version>2.0</version> with no more success.
>>
>> One hates to complain about the documentation on an excellent volunteer
>> project, but I can't help feeling that you'd save yourselves (and us) a lot
>> of time with some updated documentation. Perhaps take a breath before 3.0,
>> write some guides, and watch your adoption rate soar?
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
