Hi all, during the change of a bigger project to RSLs I noticed that libraries are way bigger than they should be. After looking further into this I found out that a library is ALWAYS statically linked against dependencies, no mater wheter the scope is RSL or Caching.
You can find a more detailed explanation and a sample project at http://www.yeap.de/blog2.0/archives/203-Size-of-Flex-RSLs-with-dependencies-to-other-RSLs.html Velo, are you already aware of this? As of my understanding I assume a bug in the Flex compiler and not in flex-mojos, but I would like to hear your opinion, before I file a JIRA report at Adobe. Best regards, Carsten --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
