We might be willing to pay for a once-off FDK, but not a service contract. Our company is becoming allergic to service contracts in today's economy. We were also hoping that flex-mojos would be more open, in the spirit of open source, but I guess the descriptor xml file falls outside of this scope, perhaps.
You really should remove the Wiki page of the descriptor file is proprietary, no ? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > So, I usually deploy a new FDK version when a sonatype customer asks to. > > Mainly because latest FDK from Adobe are coming with an inconsistent layout > and even being shipped with wrong version on some swc/jar... so I do need > to manually find this kind of inconsistencies before I can deploy. It is > really a PITA. If I could trust the FDK the process wouldn't take more then > 15 minutes, but since I can't it does take more then one hour to get it done > right... most of the work is manual and I see no way to automate it, at > least not in a simple way.... =/ > > I will drop a word on sonatype about a support plan... like the maven > ones.... that does include extra FDK deploys and a more direct support > line.... like what we already had for maven > http://store.sonatype.com/support > No promises on that. > > But are you guys around the world interested on something like that? Would > be a nice way to support the project and also would give me more time to > work on it, instead of free time. > > > VELO > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Grant Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I understand. It might be a good idea to remove the Wiki entry to avoid >> people like me being confused :) >> I guess the only solution to my problem, then is to wait for you to >> publish a new SDK on sonatype's repo. I'm specifically looking for >> 4.0.0.11171 which solves a HUGE problem for me. >> >> If you have time, do you think you could make it available ? >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes, I do >>> >>> No, I can not. First the file is sonatype internal so I really can't >>> make it public. Even if I could I won't, why? People did exploited it in >>> pass (on install mojo era, I was forced to delete the mojo). >>> So for the sake of the project I can't make it public and I do even ask >>> everyone that I know that made a descriptor to not make it public as well. >>> >>> Sorry for that, it is a drastic measure but it is necessary... at the >>> time I made this decision the only alternative was leaving the user list. >>> >>> >>> VELO >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Grant Smith <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi VELO, >>>> >>>> I have a situation whereby I have to install the very latest SDK. I read >>>> the Wiki article >>>> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/FLEXMOJOS/Installing+Flex+SDK+into+maven+repository >>>> and tried to figure out what to put into the descriptor xml file. I >>>> presume you used this same method internally to publish 4.0.0.10485 ? Could >>>> you show me what your descriptor file looked like for that ? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Grant Smith >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Grant Smith >> >> >> >> > > > > -- Grant Smith --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
