Guys, what are you talking about?
What do you expect as ${swf}?
v_e_l_o.swf? =D
VELO
On Dec 2, 10:03 am, Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not in the habit of setting finalName so it's a little annoying
> that I now have to.
>
> Is this a bug? I'd sooner fix the bug than have to do this.
>
> I presume this finalName is set in the swf project being wrapped?
>
> Cheers
>
> On 19 Nov, 16:20, Jboss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > For people that might have the same issue:
>
> > Adding a finalName does work, as long as it does not contain any
> > properties.
> > In order to let it work out of the box with the copy-flex-resources
> > goal, the finalName must be equal to ${project.artifactId}-$
> > {project.version} but without the use of properties.
>
> > On 19 nov, 16:33, Jboss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > nm my last post.
> > > I see what you mean. it takes the finalName which is by default
> > > resolved to ${project.artifactId}-${project.version}.
>
> > > In my case however ${project.artifactId} and ${project.version} seem
> > > not to be resolved themselves.
>
> > > On 19 nov, 16:30, Jboss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Adding a finalName on the swf pom doesnt change anything for me. Also
> > > > the 102 sample does not have a finalName declared.
>
> > > > On 19 nov, 16:19, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > It should be using ${project.build.finalName}
>
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jboss <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > I'm trying to use the flexmojos:wrappergoal for creating awrapperon
> > > > > > awar.
>
> > > > > > In my configuration I'm using the <wrapperArtifact>. All the
> > > > > > placeholders are correctly being replaced eg. ${title},
> > > > > > ${application}
> > > > > > and so on.
>
> > > > > > Only the ${swf} is being replaced by ${project.artifactId}-$
> > > > > > {project.version}
>
> > > > > > I copied my templates into the test-harness/**/flex-mojos-102
> > > > > > sample,
> > > > > > there it works flawlessly. I compared all the poms, and cannot find
> > > > > > any difference that might explain this behaviour.
>
> > > > > > Could you please tell me how the ${swf} is being resolved?
>
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Tom
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou
> > > > > > ps.com>
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
>
> > > > > >http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
