Have no idea then...

The code looks file...
If someone figure out what is wrong lemme know.


VELO


On Dec 18, 1:07 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> FWIW - I was able to verify that in my setup, allowHeadlessMode=false
> does work in build runs from Hudson, using 3.5-SNAPSHOT.  We're using
> the xvnc plugin and don't want xvfb-run to be used during the build.
> All seems to be working well.
>
> -Brian
>
> On Nov 23, 5:22 pm, velo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I think FLEXMOJOS-196 is fixed on 3.5-SNAPSHOT....  is just a matter
> > of closing it.
>
> > There is no real planned date to 3.5.... I guess I can do that anytime
> > =D
> > There isn't much done so 
> > far...https://issues.sonatype.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jql...
>
> > 196 fix:http://scm.sonatype.org/revinfo.svn?revision=1515&name=flexmojos
>
> > VELO
>
> > On Nov 23, 4:29 pm, Collin Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I can confirm that using 3.5-SNAPSHOT did run the tests.  I see the
> > > following output:
> > >   [INFO] Running tests /opt/tomcat/hudson_work/jobs/intouch-devel/
> > > workspace/intouch-devel/flexV3/intouch-flex-core-lib/target/test-
> > > classes/TestRunner.swf
> > >   [WARNING] [LAUNCHER] Using xvfb-run to launch headless tests
> > >   [INFO]
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >   [INFO] Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time Elapsed: 0 sec
>
> > > So it appears that xvfb is now operational in Hudson.  Can you direct
> > > me to the ticket # or revision # of the fix just so I can have a
> > > peek?  Will FLEXMOJOS-196 be fixed as well in 3.5?
>
> > > Also, do you have a idea of when 3.5 will be released?  I haven't been
> > > running tests on my Flex code in Hudson since 3.3 because of this.
> > > I've just been using my local maven builds to run the tests.  So it
> > > will be nice to have this issue fixed.
>
> > > Collin
>
> > > On Nov 20, 10:41 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > FWIW, an user submited a fix for another problem related to that, that 
> > > > may
> > > > be fixed on 3.5-SNAPSHOT, if you could give a shot what would be nice.
>
> > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Collin Peters 
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > We had VNC running with FlexMojos 3.2 and everything worked fine.  3.3
> > > > > broke things though, see the following links for more info:
> > > > >  *
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos/browse_thread/thread/f3754f...
> > > > >  *https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-196
>
> > > > > I haven't had time to look any closer since I reported the bug.  I am
> > > > > testing now with 3.4.2 but as the bug is still open I'm not holding
> > > > > out much hope.  I am also not sure of the difference between
> > > > > <headlessServer>true</headlessServer> and <allowHeadlessMode>false</
> > > > >allowHeadlessMode>.  I guess the former is a Flex compiler option and
> > > > > the latter (which is the one with the bug) is supposed to prevent xvfb
> > > > > from running
>
> > > > > As of right now this bug prevents us from running tests with Hudson
> > > > > and Flex Mojos so the options are to revert back to 3.2, or to skip
> > > > > all tests in the project with -skipTests=true
>
> > > > > Collin
>
> > > > > On Nov 18, 6:35 am, Nicolas Delsaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Logan Allred <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > However, the flashplayer cannot be run on a headless machine. 
> > > > > > > Hudson
> > > > > > > has a plugin called the Xvnc plugin that will create a virtual 
> > > > > > > window
> > > > > > > system so the flashplayer can run. We use it with Flexmojos 2.0.3 
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > of the time. However, I have not tried it with the new Flexmojos 
> > > > > > > 3.x
> > > > > > > xvfb runner to see if they conflict. Does anyone else have the 
> > > > > > > Hudson
> > > > > > > Xvnc plugin working with Flexmojos 3.x?
>
> > > > > > Well, i could try, but do not know how to configure xvnc ... So if 
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > have a sample configuration file, send it over the mailing list for 
> > > > > > me
> > > > > > to try it.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Nicolas Delsaux
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
>
> > > > >http://blog.flex-mojos.info/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en

http://blog.flex-mojos.info/

Reply via email to