Hi, is there any specific reason why you made it work like that?
Without knowing anything about the FM internals and objectively speaking, I think that it should follow Flex SDK docs/guidelines as much as possible. On top of that, it is obviously very cumbersome to have to list and maintain these classes manually for big libraries like ours. regards, Christophe 2009/12/24 velo <[email protected]> > On Dec 24, 10:32 am, Christophe Herreman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should we conclude that FM should also use include-classes instead of > > include-sources by default? > > No, flexmojos default is include-sources using the same > sourcePaths..... > If set any other include flexmojos won't do it's default. > > So do include-classes manually. > > > VELO > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en > > http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ > -- Christophe Herreman http://www.herrodius.com http://www.springactionscript.org http://www.as3commons.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
