Yup, you're right. I got down the track of changing the group/
artifactId b/c of the way their code is structured....would be cool if
there was a way for flexmojos to use sort of an alias like "flexunit4"
and leave the details abstracted away, so it doesn't care about
groupId being com.adobe.flexunit or org.flexunit ...just a random
thought.

thanks

On Dec 28, 5:20 pm, velo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Expected behavior, you didn't include any supported unit test
> framework.
>
> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/FLEXMOJOS/Unit+test+frameworks+GAV
>
> VELO
>
> On Dec 28, 5:10 pm, codecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm trying to use FlexMojos 3.5 with FlexUnit4 (RC1, specifically) and
> > when I run "mvn clean test" I'm getting:
>
> > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] Not found any compatible unit test framework: [myapp:gui,
> > com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework,
> > com.adobe.flex.framework:flex, com.adobe.flex.framework:framework,
> > com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc, com.adobe.flex.framework:utilities,
> > com.adobe.flex.framework:playerglobal, org.spicefactory:parsley-
> > complete-flex, org.spicefactory:spicelib-complete-flex, asmock:asmock,
> > org.flexunit:flexunit, org.flexunit:flexunit-uilistener]
>
> > I have the following "test" scoped dependencies (not even sure that I
> > need the UI Listener at the moment):
>
> >         <dependency>
> >             <groupId>org.flexunit</groupId>
> >             <artifactId>flexunit</artifactId>
> >             <version>4.0.0</version>
> >             <type>swc</type>
> >             <scope>test</scope>
> >         </dependency>
> >         <dependency>
> >             <groupId>org.flexunit</groupId>
> >             <artifactId>flexunit-uilistener</artifactId>
> >             <version>4.0.0</version>
> >             <type>swc</type>
> >             <scope>test</scope>
> >         </dependency>
>
> > I do not have a reference to flexunit support stuff (since I know as
> > of 3.4.0 we should no longer reference it in our pom.xml's), any ideas?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en

http://blog.flex-mojos.info/

Reply via email to