Right now the know fix is to use maven 2.0.10 Sent from DROID
Em 12/02/2010 21:28, "Ronak Patel" <[email protected]>escreveu: I can second this. I see this when I build the war file module itself. When I do a top level build, the value gets substituted properly. Any ideas? On Jan 25, 3:07 am, velo <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm trying with the example on svn at: > > flexmojos/flexmojos-testing/flexmojos-test-harness/projects/concept/ > >copy-flex-resources > > replacing the value of %{flexmojos.version} with 3.4.2 and 3.5.0 or > > 3.6-SNAPSHOT in both child modules pom.xml (BTW how does this special > > property syntax work?) > > Black magic ;) > > I do use and special interpolator that does look for %{variable} > instead of ${variable}. That way I can keep maven ${variables} > untouched but still enforce the right version of flexmojos gets > executed on ITs. > > > > > if I issue "mvn clean install" from thecopy-flex-resourcesdir > > everything is ok, if I go into the war subdir and I launch it again I > > get the file with the wrong name: ${project.artifactId}-$ > > {project.version}.swf > > ok, I can try that, did you filed a ticket? > > VELO -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. T... http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
