@Velo - Ok, thanks for the help. I'll try it on a couple other machines and OSes to see what results I get.
-Brian On Mar 26, 12:51 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > 3.0-alpha-7... > > But the ITs are executed using 2.0.9 and it just work, so I don't think this > one is maven related. > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Velo - Out of curiousity, which version of Maven are you running on > > your machine? I'm running 2.0.11. > > > -Brian > > > On Mar 26, 12:05 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It just works > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > @Velo - Everything seems kosher with the sample I attached based on > > > > what you're saying, if you find time to take a peak, let me know. To > > > > make things easier going forward, I'll pull the Maven example from the > > > > FlexUnit4 samples and point the community to your integration examples > > > > on SVN. Thanks for the help. > > > > > -Brian > > > > > On Mar 26, 11:56 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No, but just move the parent zip content to child pom. > > > > > > VELO > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > @Velo - By SVN example, you mean the FM examples using the > > super-pom? > > > > > > Do you have samples not using the super-pom that work with flex- > > > > > > framework? If not, the zip has an example not using the super-pom > > > > > > that you could give a try. :) > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > On Mar 26, 11:47 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I took the SVN example and set flex version to 4.0.0.14159 > > > > > > > > VELO > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Brian <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > @Velo - If you got the example working then I'm crazy and will > > work > > > > it > > > > > > > > out on my own :) > > > > > > > > > On a side note, is 4.x going to address the transitive scope > > > > > > > > limitation on com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework such that > > the > > > > > > > > default framework RSLs will be used rather than just merged > > into > > > > the > > > > > > > > resulting swf/swc? Or is this something we'll have to wait on > > > > Maven 3 > > > > > > > > to get that type of support? > > > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > > > On Mar 26, 11:36 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I tried here, flex-framework work just fine. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Brian LeGros < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > @Velo - Ok, looks like it's my project giving me issues. I > > > > updated > > > > > > > > > > the FlexUnit4 sample (as a hello world) to use Flex4 and > > > > > > 4.0.0.14159 > > > > > > > > > > and it worked when I explicitly specified the following > > > > framework > > > > > > > > > > dependencies (using default scope): > > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>text-layout</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>osmf</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>spark</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>datavisualization</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <!-- Framework SWCs --> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>playerglobal</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <classifier>10.0</classifier> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > <scope>external</scope> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>flex</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>utilities</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <!-- Framework RBs --> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>spark</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > <classifier /> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > <classifier /> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>datavisualization</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <classifier>en_US</classifier> > > > > > > > > > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <!-- Framework config --> > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > > <classifier>configs</classifier> > > > > > > > > > > <type>zip</type> > > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > > When I used com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework in the > > POM, > > > > as > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > original example did, compilation failed with the following > > > > error: > > > > > > > > > > > [ERROR] > > > /Users/brian.legros/Desktop/blegros-flexunit-75184d2/FlexUnit4SampleCIProject/target/classes/libraries/spark.swc(spark.components:SkinnableContainer):[-1,-1] > > > > > > > > > > Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant: > > > > > > > > > > [mx.core]::IDeferredContentOwner. > > > > > > > > > > > I saw this is still the recommended way to use the SDK on > > the > > > > > > "Getting > > > > > > > > > > Started" page on the main website. Has this changed? I've > > > > > > attached a > > > > > > > > > > zip of the project using the > > > > > > com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework > > > > > > > > > > so you can see the compilation error. Please note I've > > only > > > > > > updated > > > > > > > > > > the POM, the Ant builds, and FlashBuilder metadata were not > > > > > > updated. > > > > > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 5:43 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> If you can provide a hello world sample like of the > > problem, > > > > > > yes, > > > > > > > > > > otherwise > > > > > > > > > > >> is worthless. > > > > > > > > > > > >> VELO > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Brian < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > I have a project using FM 3.6-SNAPSHOT and SDK > > > > 4.0.0.10485, > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > > >> > running w/o issue including the integration with the > > > > built-in > > > > > > unit > > > > > > > > > > >> > testing support. The stand-alone FP opens and closes > > as > > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > > > > >> > When I upgraded to 4.0.0.13875, I'm getting a time out > > > > from > > > > > > the FM > > > > > > > > > > >> > test runner. The trace output from my debug log file > > > > shows > > > > > > > > successful > > > > > > > > > > >> > runs of all my tests and then the rest of the file > > ... > > read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to flex-mojos+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
