Much appreciated for that. VELO
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > VELO, > > I will create an entry in the FAQ this week, > > Regards, > Jon > > PS Sorry about the delay. For some reason, I was not notified about > the following messages. > > > On Jul 22, 8:33 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nice, could you write an entry on flexmojos faq? > > > > VELO > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was able to work around the issue by ordering > > > > > <dependency> > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > > <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > <type>pom</type> > > > </dependency> > > > after my all other com.adobe.flex.framework dependencies. This > > > solution works for Maven 2.2.1 and 3.0-beta-1. > > > > > On Jul 22, 7:53 pm, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > [Marvin suggested I post this issue discussion here instead of > > > > continuing the in the bug report, > > >https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-331.] > > > > > > When using flexmojos:compile-swf with Flex SDK 4.1.0.16076 and using > > > > caching scope, the SWF artifact attempts to load datavisualization > > > > first causing the Flash VerifyError: Error #1014: Class > > > > mx.effects::TweenEffect could not be found. The Flash player is > > > > loading datavisualization_4.1.0.16076.swz before any other > frameworks. > > > > > > My pom.xml dependency order matches the RSL order in flex-config.xml. > > > > This is the same order in defined in com.adobe.flex.framework:common- > > > > framework:4.0.0.14159. Maven resolves the RSL dependencies using the > > > > sort order from com.adobe.flex.framework:common-framework. This order > > > > is used in turn by the flexmojos:compile-swf goal to order the "- > > > > runtime-shared-library-path=..." arguments. For some reason, > > > > com.adobe.flex.framework:common-framework:4.1.0.1607 sorts the > > > > dependency order alphabetically. Is this an oversight or am I missing > > > > the reason? > > > > > > Would a work-around be to create my own > com.adobe.flex.framework:flex- > > > > framework:4.1.0.1607 that references my reordered > > > > com.adobe.flex.framework:common-framework:4.1.0.1607? > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > <flex-mojos%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou ps.com> > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
